← Search

Kaitlyn Peeples Cole

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Asheville, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 71W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-08-30 · WNCA Rosenfelt (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Olesiuk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-28 · WNCA Rosenfelt (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexis Rosenfelt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · WNCC Still (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · WNCC Still (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
Micaela Ode
2026-07-09 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-11 · WNCC Still (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Bull mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · WNCK Peeples (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yvonne Monet
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-11 · WNCK Peeples (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yvonne Monet
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-27 · WNCK Peeples (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Jackson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-20 · WNCK Peeples (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharlyn Aamodt
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-07 · WNCK Peeples (HRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sallie LaChance
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-30 · WNCK Peeples (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Peeples
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.8%
30W–13L · 58% of games
4.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 45.2% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.8% of games
6.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 63.1% of games
7.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 60.4% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.9% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova