← Search

Eva Burnham

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mesa, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 11W–8L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history19 matches
L
2025-04-09 · 3.5 LW Leisure World B Team W40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Johnson
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-03-26 · 3.5 LW Leisure World B Team W40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Harris
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-5, 0-1
W
2025-03-19 · 3.5 LW Leisure World B Team W40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Tincker
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-03-05 · 3.5 LW Leisure World B Team W40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Fontaine
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-26 · 3.5 LW Leisure World B Team W40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Tincker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-01-29 · 3.5 LW Leisure World B Team W40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Johnson
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-22 · 3.5 LW Leisure World B Team W40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Bauer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-01-15 · 3.5 LW Leisure World B Team W40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Welch
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2022-04-23 · 6.0 MTC Granard W55S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Groudan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-16 · 6.0 MTC Granard W55S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marti Heveron Ponton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2022-04-02 · 6.0 MTC Granard W55S · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Woods
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-03-26 · 6.0 MTC Granard W55S · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Bergendahl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 50.6% of games
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 58% of the time
#2 Doubles
58%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
3 matches
Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova