← Search

James Bowden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Excelsior, MN
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
13 matches · 4W–9L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history13 matches
L
2025-10-24 · Stern: Double the Fun · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Norstrem mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-10-17 · Stern: Double the Fun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Bowden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2023-03-03 · Borthwick/Bowden- Simply Smashing 6.0 18+MX W23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Bowden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2022-10-21 · Borthwick/Bowden Simply Smashing 6.0 ES23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Bowden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-06-03 · Bowden SImply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Bowden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2022-05-13 · Bowden SImply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Bowden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-06 · Eliason-Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Bowden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2021-11-21 · Lohman-Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Bowden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2021-11-14 · Lohman-Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wanda Makis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2021-10-17 · Lohman-Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Bowden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 7-5
L
2021-10-10 · Lohman-Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Dobbins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2021-07-30 · Lohman-Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shagu Heal mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
46%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams