← Search

Robert Langley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 58W–41L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history99 matches
L
2026-10-22 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Richardson
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-12 · Lewis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Malone
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paxton Ivy
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · Lewis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Malone
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-09-19 · Burbank/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael McKenna
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-24 · Burbank/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Clayton Eber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · Burbank/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael McKenna
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · Neal/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Steinhausler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · Yen/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diego Hijano
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · Yen/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cade Benedict
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-15 · Yen/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Brackett
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-29 · Yen/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diego Hijano
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.8% of games
3.5
67.6%
23W–11L · 57.1% of games
4.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 51.4% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.5% of games
7.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.2% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer