← Search

Matthew Ellman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 83W–74L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history157 matches
W
2026-10-31 · LCTA54/Peiffer/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ron Magnuson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-10-17 · LCTA54/Peiffer/LTPDI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hank Adorno
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-10-15 · LCTA64/Peiffer/LTPDI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Ward
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Ward championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Ward championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Ward championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Lund championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA64/Peiffer/LTPDI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hank Adorno
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-29 · LCTA54/Peiffer/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Kuehmeier
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
Default
2026-09-19 · LCTA55Magnuson/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Cechak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-03 · LCTA55Magnuson/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Ward
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christiane Jones mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
58.3%
56W–40L · 53.4% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 29.7% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 39.4% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.9% of games
3.5mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 54.6% of games
4.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King