← Search

James Lund

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Charleston, SC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
214 matches · 52W–162L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history214 matches
L
2026-10-31 · LCTA54/Lund/LTPDI · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Etheridge
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-29 · LTP/DI Peiffer 64 & Over · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jack Barker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bruce Etheridge championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bruce Etheridge championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-15 · LTP/DI Peiffer 64 & Over · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with WM Scott Goodman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Ellman championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-09-26 · LCTA54/Lund/LTPDI · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Robertson
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-05 · LCTA55/Lund/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lee Larrew
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · LCTA55/Lund/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mitchell King
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-01 · LCTA55/Lund/LTPDI · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tom Morgenthal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-25 · LCTA55/Lund/LTPDI · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carl Hartman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-29 · LCTA65/Peiffer/LTPDI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with WM Scott Goodman
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
24.8%
36W–109L · 40.7% of games
4.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 29% of games
6.5
29%
9W–22L · 43.1% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 19.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams