← Search

Susan Caskey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 39W–15L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history54 matches
W
2026-02-23 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa McGillis
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-16 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Hogan
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-01-05 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa McGillis
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-12-01 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Hogan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-24 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa McGillis
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-11-17 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Hogan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-10 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Seidl
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harbert championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Werchek championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Hogan championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Hogan championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-17 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bernadette Devoe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
7W–0L · 68.1% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.4% of games
8.0
64.7%
22W–12L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe