← Search

Barbara Beard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bonita Springs, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 30W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history66 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Heritage Bay / L. Keillor · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carla Klumpp
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-19 · COLLIER/Adult55&over8.0W/ L.Keillor · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Fortunato
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-01 · Heritage Bay / L. Keillor · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Tilley
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-20 · Heritage Bay / L. Keillor · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susanna Haedelt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-05-16 · Sterling Oaks / Alderman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Doria
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-08 · Sterling Oaks / Alderman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Doria
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-07 · Sterling Oaks / Alderman · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marie Dorazio
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-31 · Sterling Oaks / Alderman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Coates
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-03 · Sterling Oaks / Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Waldon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-01-13 · Sterling Oaks / Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Waldon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-03-18 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Waldon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-02-26 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Waldon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games
7.0
64%
16W–9L · 55.1% of games
7.5
25%
3W–9L · 46.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer