← Search

Tina Doria

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bonita Springs, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 8W–15L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history23 matches
W
2026-03-19 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy McHale
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Coates
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-29 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Schroer
loading the estimate
5-7
W
2026-01-22 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Coates
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-01-19 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Beam
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-12-04 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Coates
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-13 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy McHale
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-10-30 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy McHale
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-10-16 · Sterling Oaks / McHale · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Coates
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-16 · Sterling Oaks / Alderman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Beard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-08 · Sterling Oaks / Alderman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Beard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-21 · Sterling Oaks / Alderman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marie Dorazio
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 50.9% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams