← Search

Yoanna Franchini

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newtown, CT
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 38W–36L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history74 matches
L
2026-09-30 · TCT:Tri 3.5:Franchini · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randa Trivisonno
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · TCT: 3.5 Racquettes Spring 40: Buschauer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randa Trivisonno
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · TCT:3.5 Racquettes:Buschauer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randa Trivisonno
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-07 · TCT:3.5 Racquettes:Buschauer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randa Trivisonno
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-15 · TCT:The Game Changers:Hawley/Schoffstall · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joan Hawley
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-04 · TCT:The Game Changers:Hawley/Schoffstall · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jen Hinkle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-06 · TCT:The Game Changers:Hawley/Schoffstall · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Schoffstall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-10-18 · MRC:Love Means Nothing:Bandak/ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mina Kim
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-05 · MRC:The Dream Team:Bandak/ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mina Kim
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-09-28 · MRC:Love Means Nothing:Bandak/ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliana Foster
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-06-22 · Q EBT:40-Love:Bandak · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with AMY MCCORMACK
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-05-30 · Q EBT:40-Love:Bandak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Dever
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 64.1% of games
3.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 49% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 28.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#1 Singles
28%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer