← Search

Nate Kacatin

Bellingham, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 71W–25L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Nate Kacatin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-06-06 · FC-2006 Federer-Galang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emmanuel Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · FC-2006 Federer-Galang · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emmanuel Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · FC-2006 Federer-Galang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Weiping Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · FC-2006 Federer-Galang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Liang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-10 · FC-2006 Federer-Galang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Shin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chien Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-17 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · FC-2006 Federer-Galang · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · FC-Hit Happens Again-Pham · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Calvey Khim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6
L
2026-03-15 · FC-Hit Happens Again-Pham · #1 Male Singles · 4.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
90%
9W–1L · 60.6% of games
4.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 52.2% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 32.9% of games
3.5mixed
100%
10W–0L · 75% of games
4.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 60% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
10W–0L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 63.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#1 Male Doubles
16%
15 matches
#1 Male Singles
12%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer