← Search

Angela Cochis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 119W–69L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history188 matches
L
2026-11-02 · Gardendale - Fletcher · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-17 · JLTC - Pearson/Maneice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlene Linson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-08 · Gardendale - Fletcher · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Zeier
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-03 · JLTC - Pearson/Maneice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Maneice
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-24 · Gardendale - Fletcher · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Zeier
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-20 · JLTC - Rembert /Scott 3.5 Mixed Team · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-09-03 · Gardendale - Fletcher · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · BH - Maneice · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · Braue/Cochis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Braue
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · BH - Maneice · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tray Ivey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-06 · Braue/Cochis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Braue
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-22 · Braue/Cochis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Braue
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
69%
58W–26L · 59.5% of games
3.0
64.5%
40W–22L · 57.7% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.9% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 28.8% of games
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.6% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.4% of games
3.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.2% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
92 matches
#1 Singles
26%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
16 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert