Search

Amber Jarvis

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 90W–54L · seasons 20222026

Captains: add Amber Jarvis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-08-26 · RDavis-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · CHaywood-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dallas Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · ALeinbach.7.5C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Lahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · TWeber-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tess Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
N/Amixed
2026-07-30 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeeka Karnas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · BBlackburn-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Proctor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-18 · ALeinbach-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Breah Woolson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · MLong.3.5-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shivam Panthri
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · ALeinbach-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
James Hadler / Alexandra Millhollandmixed
2026-06-09 · BBlackburn-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Glish
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · MLong.3.5-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajiv Nair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeeka Karnas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.2% of games
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 66.2% of games
3.5
50%
18W–18L · 52.3% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.9% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0
75%
6W–2L · 58.9% of games
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 60.1% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 66.7% of games
3.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 72% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King