Search

Paige Brown

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
145 matches · 82W–63L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Boise · 3.5
82 of 111
ID · 3.5
189 of 289
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Paige is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Paige has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Paige has gone from the 72nd to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 54.7% of games
3.5
48.7%
19W–20L · 50.6% of games
4.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 41.8% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
75%
12W–4L · 61.4% of games
7.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 60.9% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.016better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Vasey Stephens
2026-06-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.020about as expected — took 29% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Caitlin Bower
2026-06-02 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Sonia Ivanova
2026-06-01 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
Kim Balangue / Christine Cannon
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marnie Newton
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-0
L
Sondra Power-Thornton / Betsy McDonald
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassie Ewing
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dit Dudley
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsey Melby
+0.022better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.