← Search

Christine Cannon

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 82W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Cannon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
L
2026-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Tesnohlidek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Raborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Raborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Raborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Yost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Toney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-02 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Deahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Balangue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-26 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rusk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-06 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rusk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Judy DeBoer / Jennifer Boyd
2026-05-05 · Nice Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Rusk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-04 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rusk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
52.3%
56W–51L · 49.4% of games
3.5
15.6%
10W–54L · 36.3% of games
6.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 44.7% of games
6.5mixed
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
50 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal