← Search

Lacey Craig

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 51W–59L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-10-04 · Craig/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Witte
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-30 · Tidwell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lee
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-27 · Craig/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Sand
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · Franks/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amber Sand
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-22 · Franks/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amber Sand
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · Franks/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katy Kitchens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Franks/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amber Sand
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-23 · Moody/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Cockrum
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-19 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luke Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-12 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luke Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luke Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · Moody/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeleine Bobango
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 50.3% of games
3.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 52.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–11L · 28.7% of games
5.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 42.4% of games
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 23.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe