← Search

Lorena Manriquez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Pasadena, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 5W–13L · seasons 2022–2024
Match history18 matches
L
2024-04-06 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-03-16 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-02-10 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-01-27 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Georgia de Los Santos
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-06 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-12-09 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-12-02 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-10-21 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Georgia de Los Santos
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-10-07 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2023-09-10 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-03-18 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-02-11 · SGV Smashing Divas-De Los Santos-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen McDowell
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 42% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 29.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova