← Search

Dayana Schemel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Farmington Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 54W–43L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history97 matches
W
Default
2026-10-30 · #3 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-25 · FAC-Brooks 3.0W Fall Singles F4 · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-4
L
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · with Calynn Berry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-31 · HAWK-Bosch 5.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Myles Gold mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-24 · HAWK-Bosch 5.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Myles Gold mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · HAWK-Bosch 5.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Aaron Werbling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-10 · HAWK-Bosch 5.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Myles Gold mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Jean Baker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angelica Garrido
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marva Brooks
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Larkin
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-21 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angelica Garrido
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.3% of games
3.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 49.4% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
40%
4W–6L · 45.6% of games
6.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.5% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 54.8% of games
5.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 58.3% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches
#3 Singles
7%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer