← Search

Marva Brooks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Park, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 42W–68L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-10-17 · #3 Doubles · with Carmen Walker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-11 · FAC-Brooks 3.0W Fall Singles F4 · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-10 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Taylor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carmen Walker
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Ewers
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · FAC-Melendy 55s 6.0 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Morgenstein
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-24 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angelica Garrido
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · FAC-Melendy 55s 6.0 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Melendy
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-06-16 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Herrmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Larkin
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Default
2026-06-09 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Herrmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dayana Schemel
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 58.7% of games
3.0
26.7%
12W–33L · 40.9% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.3% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#2 Singles
14%
15 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer