← Search

Carmen Walker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Park, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
261 matches · 113W–148L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history261 matches
L
2026-10-23 · FAC-Lewis 3.0W Fall Singles F1 · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-17 · #3 Doubles · with Marva Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-03 · FAC-Walker 55s 6.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amira Lewis
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · FAC-Walker 55s 6.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shannon Quinn
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · FAC-Walker 55s 6.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amira Lewis
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-07-07 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-30 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marva Brooks
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Holloman
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
Default
2026-06-16 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Heaney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amira Lewis
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Levine
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.2% of games
3.0
54.9%
78W–64L · 50.6% of games
3.5
19.6%
9W–37L · 38.4% of games
6.0
10%
1W–9L · 34.4% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
8W–2L · 57.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
44 matches
#2 Singles
13%
33 matches
#1 Singles
6%
15 matches
#3 Singles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer