← Search

Nasiba Mian

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ottawa Hills, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 25W–23L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history48 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5W Combo Myak/Damschroder-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Burnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · NWO 5.5W Combo Damschroder Green-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachel Ade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-10 · NWO 5.5W Combo Damschroder Green-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hannah Witt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-04 · NWO 6.5W Combo Myak/Damschroder-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Knemeyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-03 · NWO 5.5W Combo Damschroder Green-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachel Ade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-26 · NWO 5.5W Combo Damschroder Green-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hannah Witt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Damschroder/Myak-Bedford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Binkowski
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Damschroder/Myak-Bedford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Lancz
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-19 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Damschroder/Myak-Bedford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Milena Mrdjenovic
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Damschroder/Myak-Bedford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Garcia
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Damschroder/Myak Bedford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Milena Mrdjenovic
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Damschroder/Myak Bedford · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Pettry
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 58.5% of games
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.9% of games
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.9% of games
5.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.3% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal