← Search

Julia Euclide

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ravenna, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 19W–11L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history30 matches
L
2026-04-23 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jodie Grasgreen DeLamatre
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doris Tomko
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-26 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Breen
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-03-05 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Therese Forkin
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Banas
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-12 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Barker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-03-24 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Mead
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-10 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sloane Burgess
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-02-10 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sloane Burgess
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-07-17 · A40 3.0W LT2 Sirak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Thompson
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2024-06-26 · A40 3.0W LT2 Sirak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Ginther
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-06-11 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Ann Devine
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 68.7% of games
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 50.4% of games
6.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.9% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
14 matches
#1 Singles
27%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer