← Search

Maren Dobson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 97W–37L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history134 matches
W
2026-10-17 · #1 Doubles · with Chelsea Doyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Arthur mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Heimburger mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-29 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Heimburger mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mac Dobson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mac Dobson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Arthur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teressa Funkhouser championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Burke championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsea Doyle
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teressa Funkhouser
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 40s 3.0 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teressa Funkhouser
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 58.6% of games
3.0
77.6%
38W–11L · 59.8% of games
3.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.5% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.3% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.5% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 56.4% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 63.4% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe