Search

Nina Brown

Clarkston, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
281 matches · 146W–135L · seasons 20212026

Captains: add Nina Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history281 matches
L
2026-08-31 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rajendra Shekhawat
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacob Sa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-10 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacob Sa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
April Mckeever / Billy Schabermixed
2026-08-04 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dheyaa Abdulhadi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Catherine Topf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Terri Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Alice Currier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-17 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Gordon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
Adrienne Eshelman / Karen Stylianou
2026-07-16 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Topf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Gordon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · FAC-Slazinski 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Ruma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Bakken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.8% of games
2.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 50% of games
3.0
69.6%
39W–17L · 60% of games
3.5
44.7%
17W–21L · 45.9% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 47.7% of games
6.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 44.6% of games
6.5
25%
3W–9L · 49.1% of games
5.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 61.2% of games
6.0mixed
51.6%
16W–15L · 51% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova