← Search

Nina Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clarkston, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
287 matches · 150W–137L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history287 matches
W
2026-10-30 · #1 Doubles · with Carrie Leff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-10-25 · #2 Doubles · with Emilia Coto
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-03 · #1 Doubles · with Samantha Ruma
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-27 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dheyaa Abdulhadi mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-26 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joshua Maurer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-31 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rajendra Shekhawat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-29 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dheyaa Abdulhadi mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacob Sa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-10 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacob Sa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-04 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dheyaa Abdulhadi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Topf championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · WESS-Reamer 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terri Griffin championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.8% of games
2.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.2% of games
3.0
67.1%
57W–28L · 57.9% of games
3.5
37%
10W–17L · 41.7% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 47.5% of games
6.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 44.6% of games
6.5
25%
3W–9L · 49.1% of games
5.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 61.2% of games
6.0mixed
56%
28W–22L · 52.2% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
83 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
68 matches
#1 Singles
8%
24 matches
#2 Singles
6%
16 matches
#3 Singles
5%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova