← Search

Victor Nambo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 53W–54L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history107 matches
W
Default
2026-10-17 · #3 Singles · 7.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-03 · CHIP-Nambo 3.5M Fall Singles F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-4
L
2026-08-29 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Barden mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · VTC-Crouson (outside) 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kamilah Kelsaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Barden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · VTC-Crouson (outside) 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lilia Cortina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-22 · CHIP-DeMoss 18s 3.5M F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Standley
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · CHELSEA-Atkinson 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Stutesman
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Barden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · VTC-Crouson (outside) 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lilia Cortina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · CHIP-DeMoss 18s 3.5M F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Standley
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · CHELSEA-Atkinson 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Stutesman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
40.7%
11W–16L · 50% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 45% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 49.6% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.9% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 23% of the time
#2 Singles
23%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
14%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
12 matches
Singles
11%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe