Janet Barden
Ann Arbor, MI
210 matches · 91W–119L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Janet Barden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history210 matches
W
Cosmo Mendez / Tracey Woolliscroftmixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
Danyelle Reynolds / Meredith Millerchamps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
Jing Bai / Sophia Fordchamps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
Eric Goeckel / Sharyn Cousinsmixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Marya Peters / Tram Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2022–2026
LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBO
LIB-Barden 5.5W Weekend Combo F
LIB-Barden 6.0X 55&O F
LIB-Cornelison 18s 2.5 NW F1
LIB-Cornelison Coed 25 Singles F
LIB-DAWSON 18s 5.0X/Co-ed
LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F
LIB-Dawson 40&O 60 Mix F
LIB-Inoue 6.5W Weekend Combo F
LIB-Inoue Entry Tri Women F
TRAVIS- Miller 40s 3.0 NW F3
TRAVIS-Gross 18s 3.0 NW F6
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 68.7% of games
2.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 49.9% of games
3.0
36.7%
11W–19L · 45.6% of games
5.0
0%
0W–6L · 27.4% of games
5.5
65%
13W–7L · 55.1% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
65%
13W–7L · 57.2% of games
6.0mixed
46.3%
31W–36L · 50.6% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 32.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.