← Search

Janet Barden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 95W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history228 matches
W
2026-10-30 · #3 Doubles · with Xuerong Mu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-10-18 · LIB-Barden 6.0X 55&O F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Haley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-10 · #3 Doubles · with Katherine Arst
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-03 · #2 Doubles · with Alina Syed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Nambo mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBO · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Aaron Ward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBO · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Robert Kubis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBO · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Robert Kubis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · LIB-Cornelison 18s 2.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Naomi Goldberg championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · LIB-Cornelison 18s 2.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Naomi Goldberg championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Nambo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-24 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Pohl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 68.7% of games
2.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 47.8% of games
3.0
35.5%
11W–20L · 45.2% of games
5.0
0%
0W–6L · 27.4% of games
5.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 52.2% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
65%
13W–7L · 57.2% of games
6.0mixed
40.5%
34W–50L · 47.9% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 32.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
11 matches
Singles
5%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova