← Search

Lori Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naperville, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 31W–3L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history34 matches
W
2026-10-17 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Wagner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-20 · NITA E 35W40a Naperville-Gabel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Yacullo
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-19 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Wagner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-11 · NITA S 70W55e Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Harte
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-2
W
2026-07-22 · NITA S 70W55e Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Lee
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-15 · NITA W 35W40b Naperville-Gabel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Toney
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-02-20 · NITA W 35W40b Naperville-Gabel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Ruden
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · NITA W 35W40b Naperville-Gabel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Ruden
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-31 · NITA W 70W55d Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Burke-Concannon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-10 · NITA W 70W55d Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Toney
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-12-14 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Toney
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-08 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryann Balaun
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.8% of games
7.0
100%
20W–0L · 71.3% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe