← Search

Amanda Medler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kingwood, TX
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 3W–9L · seasons 2023–2023
Match history12 matches
L
2023-06-23 · Kingwood CC - Lady Lobbers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Perry
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-09 · Kingwood CC - Lady Lobbers · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-05-24 · Kingwood CC - Lady Lobbers · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-05-18 · Kingwood CC - Lady Lobbers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lyn Jones
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-05-17 · Glasscock-Goldfish-KCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-02 · Kingwood CC - Lady Lobbers · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-04-18 · Kingwood CC - Lady Lobbers · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2023-04-14 · KWCC - Goldfish · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Wright
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-28 · KWCC - Goldfish · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Candace Love
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-03-03 · KWCC - Goldfish · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Wright
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-02-28 · KWCC - Goldfish · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Scott
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-02-23 · KWCC - Goldfish · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bobbie Glasscock
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 48% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#2 Singles
25%
3 matches
#1 Singles
17%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer