← Search

Gerald Gallagher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 24W–71L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history95 matches
L
2026-10-03 · CHI E 55M6.0 2.Wilm Esancy Sat 11 $20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Betts
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · CHI E 55M7.0 2.MTC Brown Sat 7 $34.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Gork
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · CDTA S ComboX6.5 1.Wilm Mesh Sat 9 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with MARY GALLAGHER mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-11 · CDTA S M40&O7.0 3.Wilm Mesh Fri 7 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with MARY GALLAGHER mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · CDTA S ComboX6.5 1.Wilm Mesh Sat 9 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with MARY GALLAGHER mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 5.Wilm Mesh Sat 3 $20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Don Duszynski
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
Default
2026-07-11 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 2.Wilm Mesh-2 Sat 11 $20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Androw
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · CDTA S 55&OM7.0 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Rowe
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-27 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 2.Wilm Mesh-2 Sat 11 $20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Androw
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 5.Wilm Mesh Sat 3 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexander Drapatsky
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 5.Wilm Mesh Sat 3 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Snyders
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-06-06 · CDTA S 55&OM7.0 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Compton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 45.7% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
17.9%
5W–23L · 30.2% of games
6.5mixed
28.1%
9W–23L · 43.1% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 31.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer