← Search

Jamie Cegelski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 39W–16L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-06-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristi Kaiser
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jolinda Gladstein
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-09 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane de Seve
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynette Leighton
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · NAPA V CC 40AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Jane Holman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gaebe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-31 · NAPA V CC 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Jane Holman
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-22 · NAPA V CC 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yukie Toyama
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-27 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eleanor Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Malloy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-10-04 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW5.5B · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Mccaffrey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-09-17 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eleanor Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 73.8% of games
3.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.2% of games
5.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.2% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams