← Search

Michael Gostintsev

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 126W–54L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Michael Gostintsev to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Slopspin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irving Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · Double Trouble-Zhu · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Stephen Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-2
W
2026-08-05 · Double Trouble-Zhu · #1 Male Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
W
2026-07-13 · Slopspin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irving Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · 2nd Serve Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · ETC-3.5M-Box · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · ETC-Spin-And-Grin-Ciccotosto · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · ETC-Spin-And-Grin-Ciccotosto · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · ETC-3.5M-Box · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-23 · ETC-Spin-And-Grin-Ciccotosto · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-10 · ETC-3.5M-Box · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
11W–0L · 81% of games
3.0
71%
22W–9L · 59.5% of games
3.5
83.9%
26W–5L · 64.1% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 49.4% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.9% of games
3.5mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 56.9% of games
6.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 62.9% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
24 matches
#1 Male Doubles
9%
17 matches
#1 Male Singles
9%
17 matches
#2 Singles
9%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer