Bong Kim
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
River Edge, NJ
28 matches · 20W–8L · seasons 2024–2025
Match history28 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 65.4% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 71.4% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 57.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.