← Search

Becca Beers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 62W–58L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history120 matches
L
2026-09-19 · West Homewood - White/Hilsmier · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer McCain
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-12 · West Homewood - White/Hilsmier · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-08 · Hoover Met - Miller · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · West Homewood - Bradley/Arnold · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Arnold
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · West Homewood - Bradley/Arnold · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Jane Armstrong
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · West Homewood - Bradley/Arnold · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Muha
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-06 · West Homewood - Bradley/Arnold · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hazl Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · BHRC - Dutton Spring 2026 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xinyu Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · West Homewood - Granger/Casey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Gray
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · West Homewood - Granger/Casey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Gray
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-19 · West Homewood - Clark · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-2
L
2026-01-29 · West Homewood - Clark · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cassandra Hall
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
38.5%
10W–16L · 47.8% of games
3.0
61.5%
32W–20L · 55.4% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 52.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.9% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 52.6% of games
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.4% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#1 Singles
15%
18 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams