← Search

Molly Osborn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 99W–76L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history175 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Hoover Met - Miller - 3.5 Sat. · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luping Zheng
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-24 · Hoover Met - Miller - 3.5 Sat. · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyndall Spooner Robbins
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · Hoover Met - Miller - 3.5 Sat. · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luping Zheng
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-29 · West Homewood - Carter/Arnold · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jane Armstrong
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-19 · Hoover Met - Miller - 3.5 Sat. · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyndall Spooner Robbins
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-08 · PRC - Wilson - Fall 3.5 Tues · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Segrest
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · Hoover Met - Miller/Nace 3.0-4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Hoover Met - Miller/Nace 3.0-4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Johnson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · Hoover Met - Bird/Wallace · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Ward
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-31 · Hoover Met - Bird/Wallace · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madeline Tisdale
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-02-22 · West Homewood- Stiles/Hoerner · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-21 · West Homewood- Stiles/Hoerner · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kris Holcombe
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 59.7% of games
3.0
61.2%
41W–26L · 57.3% of games
3.5
37.8%
14W–23L · 47.2% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
6W–6L · 54.7% of games
2.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.6% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.8% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
45 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova