← Search

Thomas Weeks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Farmington, UT
2.5M year-end 2023
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
7 matches · 2W–5L · seasons 2023–2024
Match history7 matches
L
2024-03-15 · Liberty Park Tennis-Love/Weeks · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Weeks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-2
W
2024-03-08 · Liberty Park Tennis-Love/Weeks · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Weeks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
W
2024-03-01 · Liberty Park Tennis-Love/Weeks · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Weeks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-03-24 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hatch · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Weeks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-17 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hatch · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Weeks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-10 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hatch · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Weeks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-4, 0-1
L
2023-02-10 · Liberty Park Tennis-Hatch · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Weeks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2023–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer