← Search

Heshan Liu

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 72W–19L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history91 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Simply Smashing Chalmers RAC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-24 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wang championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-10-11 · Simply Smashing Chalmers RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wang
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · Simply Smashing Chalmers RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wang
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-09-12 · 2026 Chambers/Singh RAC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Singh mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-12 · 2026 Chambers/Singh RAC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fabricio Amorim mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-23 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-22 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wang championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wang championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.5% of games
3.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 67.5% of games
3.5
87.2%
34W–5L · 60.6% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.6% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#2 Singles
15%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#1 Singles
11%
10 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova