← Search

Taylor Kent

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 107W–27L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history134 matches
W
2026-11-02 · LCTA18/Williams/StAndrews · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Zhang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-27 · LCTA18/Richey/CTC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Zhang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-20 · LCTA18/Richey/CTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-19 · LCTA18/Williams/StAndrews · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Kardohely
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-29 · LCTA18/Richey/CTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-21 · LCTA18/Williams/StAndrews · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine MacKelcan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Zhang championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tamara Hale championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Tonelis championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · LCTA18/Williams/StAndrews · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Devetski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · LCTA18/Richey/CTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cynthia Zhang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · LCTA18/Williams/StAndrews · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Devetski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
92.3%
24W–2L · 64.8% of games
3.5
75.7%
28W–9L · 65.7% of games
4.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 62.2% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 69.8% of games
7.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 57.8% of games
8.5
100%
5W–0L · 70.9% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 67.2% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 56.6% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert