← Search

Tijana Subotic

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 91W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-11-02 · LCTA18/Goddard/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Shoemaker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-10-26 · LCTA18/Goddard/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Shoemaker
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Goddard/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Milo
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-20 · LCTA18/Richey/CTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Youngner
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-19 · LCTA18/Goddard/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Ryan
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · #3 Doubles · with Lizzie Goddard
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lizzie Goddard championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · LCTA18/Richey/CTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sara Youngner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · LCTA18/Cole/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Eddy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · LCTA (A) 5.0-4.0W 18 & Over (Richey) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lizzie Goddard
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · LCTA18/Richey/CTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hannah Shoemaker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · LCTA18/Richey/CTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lizzie Goddard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80%
40W–10L · 68.1% of games
4.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 61.5% of games
7.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 62.6% of games
8.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.3% of games
4.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 64.8% of games
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
12 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer