← Search

Alejandro Andreotti

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ames, IA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 3W–12L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history15 matches
W
2026-09-27 · Carlyle/Miller · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Renk
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-03 · Carlyle/Miller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-18 · Carlyle/Miller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Carlyle
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-02 · Carlyle/Miller · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William (Ev) Cochrane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-11-24 · Carlyle/Miller · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Carlyle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-04-13 · Pecharsky: Ames · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vitaly Pecharsky
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2024-03-16 · Pecharsky: Ames · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-17 · Pecharsky: Ames · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with William (Ev) Cochrane
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-04 · Carlyle · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-20 · Pecharsky: Ames · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ronald Miller
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-12-17 · Carlyle · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-12-16 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 21.9% of games
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#1 Singles
13%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams