← Search

David Ferrer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westfield, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 7W–4L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history11 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Beaty
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chunsheng Li
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Munson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-12 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCD Gupta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Fuller
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neal Burnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
Jon Young / Stephen Womble
2025-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Mowry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neal Burnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron McClure
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Short
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2024-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JIM Bohrer
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Fuller
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer