← Search

Abigail Katz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 21W–6L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history27 matches
W
2026-10-16 · Indy CX 6.5 MTC Moore · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-13 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-30 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-09 · Indy X18 6.0 IRCD Moore · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-21 · CIN CX 6.5 IRCD Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-14 · CIN CX 6.5 IRCD Moore · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Katz mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-10-10 · CIN CX 6.5 IRCD Moore · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Katz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-09-26 · CIN CX 6.5 IRCD Moore · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Katz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.3% of games
6.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.9% of games
6.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams