← Search

Phil Wakefield

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Melbourne, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 0W–10L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history10 matches
L
2026-02-18 · RCCB - Tattersall · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Martin
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-11 · RCCB - Tattersall · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Garrett Preisser
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-21 · RCCB - Tattersall · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Parsons
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-12 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rob Graney
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-29 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Casey
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-01-15 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Tulloch
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-01-08 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Carrillo
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-03 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Callum Tulloch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-19 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Stefik
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-05 · Rockledge - Tulloch · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mike Casey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–7L · 33.9% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 90% of the time
#3 Doubles
90%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert