← Search

Clay Anderson

— year-end
14 matches · 1W–13L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Clay Anderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Kamat-Jin (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reginald Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
Dmitry Lebedev / William Kelly
2026-04-26 · Kamat/Jin (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Bialecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · Kamat/Jin (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Bialecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Christopher Fikes / David Fox
2026-03-22 · Kamat/Jin (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-15 · Kamat/Jin (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-04 · Kamat/We Can Do It (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-07 · Kamat/We Can Do It (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erwin Orendain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-09 · Kamat/We Can Do It (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-04-06 · Kamat/We Can Do It (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjeev Kamat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-30 · Kamat/We Can Do It (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-02 · Kamat/We Can Do It (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Hunigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-28 · Kamat/We Can Do It (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams5 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 24.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams