← Search

Thomas Sbarra

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Falmouth, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
8 matches · 1W–7L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history8 matches
L
2026-06-15 · FSC:Gannon:Enea · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Bilger
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-08 · FSC:Gannon:Enea · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Beardsley
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-01 · FSC:Gannon:Enea · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Bilger
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-04-03 · WIL:Lehner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Landers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-03-22 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar/Muma · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ron April
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-15 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar/Muma · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim ONeill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-03-08 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar/Muma · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Muma
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-01 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar/Muma · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim ONeill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert