← Search

Alison Solomon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 5W–8L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history13 matches
W
2026-08-03 · DOUBLES TROUBLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hope Brown
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · DOUBLES TROUBLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Patterson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-11 · Seasoned Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frances Galvin
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · DOUBLES TROUBLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hope Brown
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · Seasoned Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Rossino
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-5
W
2026-06-26 · DOUBLES TROUBLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Boudart
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · Seasoned Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Vicinanza
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-3
L
2025-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Patterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Patterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Patterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marina Krasnopolsky
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Patterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
40%
4W–6L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match
#4 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer