← Search

Viera Thibault

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Chester, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 63W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history128 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Match Masters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Siebold
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · Match Masters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mimi Payne
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · Match Masters · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Laperle
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Mitchell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
L
Roberta Dimond / Nancy Freas
2025-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Cox
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Carzo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Cox
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Heizer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-5
W
Janet Trinsey / Linda Letier
2024-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Carzo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
L
Roberta Dimond / Anne Gaffney
2024-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginni Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Carzo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2023-08-14 · Super Seniors · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Salomaki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
30%
12W–28L · 40.7% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
64.7%
44W–24L · 54.2% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 67.4% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal