← Search

Melissa Buckland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elkton, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 20W–31L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history51 matches
L
2026-06-30 · String Theory · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arleen Mitchell
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Schultheis
loading the estimate
0-1
L
2026-06-03 · String Theory · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Deeney
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Henderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Bader
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Fitch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Bader
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Deeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Schiela
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Fitch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
Janet Trinsey / Mary Griffin
2024-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Fitch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-31 · Couch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Welch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.3% of games
7.0
40%
8W–12L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe