← Search

Sara Wasserman Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.0D year-end 2026
i
Disqualification — a rule enforcement, not a computed rating
16 matches · 12W–4L · seasons 2025–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-07-14 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Dallapiazza
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · CHIP-Bausewein 40s 2.5 NW · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jan Pemberton
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · CHIP-Bausewein 18s 5.0X/Co-ed · #2 Mixed Doubles · 5.0 · with - (DQ)* mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · CHIP-Bausewein 40s 2.5 NW · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jing Bai
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · CHIP-Bausewein 18s 2.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
Default
2026-06-19 · CHIP-Bausewein 18s 5.0X/Co-ed · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Borko Nojkov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · CHIP-Bausewein 18s 2.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-08 · CHIP-Bausewein 18s 2.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-05 · CHIP-Bausewein 18s 5.0X/Co-ed · #2 Mixed Doubles · 5.0 · with - (DQ)* mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-28 · CHIP-Swanson Coed 25 Singles F · #3 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-5
W
2026-03-21 · CHIP-Swanson Coed 25 Singles F · #3 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-4
W
2026-03-01 · CHIP-Swanson Coed 25 Singles F · #3 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.9% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Singles, 31% of the time
#3 Singles
31%
5 matches
#1 Singles
25%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
13%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
1 match
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer