← Search

James Farrell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lincoln, CA
3.5A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
42 matches · 26W–16L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history42 matches
W
2024-10-23 · LINCOLN HILLS TG/SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Shoemaker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-10-21 · LINCOLN HILLS TG/SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Hiraga
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-10-09 · LINCOLN HILLS TG/SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rod Parsons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-10-20 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maurice Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2023-10-10 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
W
2023-10-06 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Vick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2023-09-28 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Vick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-09-22 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Vick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2023-09-11 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Taylor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-09-08 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carl Lynch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2022-11-17 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2022-10-25 · SUN CITY LINCOLN S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 61.8% of games
8.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer