← Search

Stacy Lilley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Anderson, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 32W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-04-08 · UPTA55A/Matricciani/Cardinal · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lynn Watson
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-25 · UPTA55A/Matricciani/Cardinal · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Janet Matricciani
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · UPTA55A/Matricciani/Cardinal · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Norman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-04 · UPTA55A/Matricciani/Cardinal · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Donna Brookshire
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-05-18 · LCTA55/Elliott/Independant · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Alexander
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-05-18 · LCTA55/Elliott/Independant · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Alexander
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-17 · LCTA55/Elliott/Independant · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Alexander
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-17 · LCTA55/Elliott/Independant · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Alexander
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-07-02 · UPTA40T/Powell/Cardinal · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Alexander
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-06-18 · UPTA40T/Powell/Cardinal · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy White
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-06-11 · UPTA40T/Powell/Cardinal · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Mays
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-04-27 · FTA40A/Cardinal/White · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alison Mays
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 69.5% of games
9.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 66.2% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer